Slow progress on media accessibility legislation in Aotearoa

Credit: Original article can be found here

Kiwis who are deaf, blind or low vision are missing out on a myriad of rich broadcasting as a law that would help them makes little progress.

Legislation around captioning and audio descriptions in media would bring Aotearoa in line with other Western countries, like the United Kingdom, United States, Australia and Canada.

The Ministry for Culture and Heritage’s acting deputy chief executive for policy and sector performance Sheryl Pinckney said they were investigating approaches to increasing uptake.

“Additionally, as part of the development of the new public media entity, officials are working with the disabled community to determine how best to meet their needs with broadcast and digital content.”

Some television is captioned or audio described with the help of organisations like Able but other countries have made specific laws around accessible media.

PXFUEL

Some television is captioned or audio described with the help of organisations like Able but other countries have made specific laws around accessible media.

READ MORE:
* About 1.7 million Kiwis find it hard to take part in the arts
* For the love of art: Inside NZ’s record-breaking million-dollar art scene
* Accessibility in the Arts: The NZ culture scene is experiencing an awakening

The ministry did not respond to specific questions about legislation, but said the provision of captioning and audio descriptions had been discussed with affected groups.

All programmes funded through NZ On Air were captioned, as was a “significant portion” of Aotearoa’s media content, Pinckney said.

But Wendy Youens, the chief executive of Able, the country’s leading provider of media access services including captioning, subtitling and audio description, said there were still “major gaps”.

“Until we get legislation, that’s unlikely to change,” she said.

While it was positive the organisation received more funding, as it could bolster its services, a legislative requirement on broadcasters “would make all the difference”.

Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee

TVNZ chief executive Kevin Kenrick indicated 18 months ago that he believed the business case for a new public media entity needed to focus on “substance”.

The biggest barrier was broadcasters not having accessible platforms.

“Until they do that, [we] can’t provide our services on their platforms. It’s a difficult situation. Ultimately, viewers miss out.”

The demand for captioning was growing with the use of social media, Youens said.

Members of disabled communities and their advocacy groups were lobbying for accessibility legislation in all areas of public life. That included the Access Alliance, which proposes the Government introduce legislation to ensure people with visible and invisible disabilities can fully participate in communities.

“We’re hopeful that in the future there will be some change,” Youens said. “For now, Able will keep working away as hard as we can with the money we have.”

Able provides services for film and television producers, festivals, advertisers, online platforms and for television broadcasters including TVNZ, Mediaworks and Sky.

The demand for captioning was growing with the people’s use of social media.

AFR

The demand for captioning was growing with the people’s use of social media.

There was also little action in rolling out programming in New Zealand Sign Language.

Blind Low Vision NZ​ chief executive John Mulka said the wheels were turning, but it was slow progress.

“We’re quite a way behind the rest of the world.”

Other countries had provision for 100 per cent of media content being captioned between certain hours, while in New Zealand broadcasters or individual organisations like Able wore the cost of providing that service. Able is funded via NZ On Air, but had limited resource.

Pinckney said the ministry acknowledged there “may be frustration” around the development of a formal regime.

“However, officials are mindful of the specialised infrastructure and capability, particularly for live broadcasts and linear television, which are currently not available for some broadcasters.”